Not only is online learning more effective for students, it's also better for the environment. Online courses consume 90% less energy and release 85% less CO2 per student than traditional in-person courses, according to the UK Open University. Online courses are generally not as effective as in-person classes, but they are certainly better than any class. A substantial research base developed by Karl Alexander at Johns Hopkins University and many others shows that students, especially students with fewer resources at home, learn less when they are not in school.
Right now, virtual courses allow students to access lessons and exercises and interact with teachers in ways that would have been impossible if an epidemic had shut down schools even a decade or two earlier. So, we may be skeptical of online learning, but it's also time to embrace and improve it. The downside is that this requires work; we know from research that pedagogy is important. Educators can't just scan the textbook, record the lesson, put it online and expect the same or better learning.
Subscribe to the weekly update of MSUtoday to receive timely news, innovative research, inspirational videos, Spartan profiles and more. Help us deliver the content that interests you most. See the topics you would like to read about. You are already registered to receive the weekly update of MSUtoday.
Email is a quick and easy way to stay up to date on the latest news about Spartans and the work they are doing on campus and around the world. Jennifer Trenkamp, editor of MSUtoday If you have accessibility issues, let us know. With the increasing popularity of online learning, there is a constant debate about the effectiveness of online classes. Are these virtual classes as productive and fruitful as those taught in the classroom? We say yes, they are.
If done correctly, online classes can be just as effective as regular school classes, even more so for some students. In our years of experience, we have come to the conclusion that distance learning is efficient with a quality curriculum in combination with the right educational method and pedagogical approach. Online education allows the teacher and student to set their own pace of learning, and there is the added flexibility of setting a schedule that fits everyone's schedule. Using a dataset containing nearly 500,000 courses taken by more than 40,000 students at community and technical colleges in Washington State, this study examines the achievement gap between online and in-person courses and how the size of that gap differs between student subgroups and subjects.
academic. However, what was not controlled were the different types of online teaching: synchronous versus asynchronous (or for that matter, different types of face-to-face teaching). The important point of this study is that there was no attempt to redesign the courses for an online learning environment. We measured the effect on learning outcomes of a prototypical interactive learning online statistics course by randomly assigning students from six public college campuses to take the course in a hybrid format (with machine-guided instruction) accompanied by one hour of face-to-face instruction.
each one). week) or a traditional format (as typically offered on your campus, typically with approximately three hours of in-person instruction per week). The best online learning combines elements where students go at their own pace, in their own time, and are prepared to think deeply and critically about the topic, combined with elements where students connect to the Internet at the same time and interact with other students, their teacher and their content. But just because students who struggle in in-person classes are even more likely to struggle online doesn't mean it's inevitable.
At the time, there was little incentive for students to study online, as the offer of courses was extremely limited. Research has shown that students in online learning performed better than those receiving in-person instruction, but you have to do it right. This study is important because it looks at the long-term success rate of online learning, rather than short-term outcomes, such as course completion or course grades. This is mandatory reading in any discussion of comparisons between online and in-person teaching, and especially for those who will have disadvantaged students in their online courses.